Join Now

Member Blog: Nevada’s Quarter of Discontent

by Glenn H. Truitt, Esq., Ideal Business Partners

There’s been a lot of positive press lately about the success of the cannabis industry in Nevada, and with good reason. The cannabis industry contributed more than $110 million dollars in FY19 to state coffers and is poised to overtake the mining industry in annual tax contributions; all of this in just its second year of operations. But while the tax-generating retail industry continues to steam ahead, much of the business and opportunity in the balance of the industry remains on hold (since early October). The responsible moratorium has largely been erased from public awareness by the intervening holiday season and the ongoing success of tax collections over projections.

Unfortunately, while this suspension was necessary in light of the surrounding circumstances, its indefinite duration has created market instability at a time when cannabis-friendly markets are competing for business and tax dollars. Regrettably, this uncertainty has made Nevada look more like the nearly paralyzed California market. The time has come to complete the necessary work, end this moratorium and let the critical behind-the-scenes elements of our nationally leading industry get back to work.

For those that don’t recall, the present moratorium was announced by the Nevada Department of Taxation on October 17, 2019 following the recommendations of a task force initiated by the Governor. The launch of the task force was in response to two scandals: one involving the awarding of retail licenses earlier in the year and the second being the discovery that the foreign nationals identified in a national campaign finance scandal (involving former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani), had sought to invest in and seek influence over the local cannabis industry. 

Few can argue the need for a regulatory pause given the state of affairs last October, and I believe the Governor’s response was the single most effective way to stifle inappropriate corporate activity. By the simple administrative step of freezing all pending and future license transfers, the state was able to get the lawyers involved in these transactions to shut them down. The final step in almost any merger or acquisition transaction became temporarily unlawful. There’s no need for a police force when every lawyer in the industry can be deputized. 

This Friday will mark ninety days since the moratorium was put into place, and would be a fine time to release this de facto suspension of all mergers, acquisitions, sales, financing, etc. After a decade and a half of practice in transactional law, I can tell you that the “invisible hand” of the market that most of us rely upon to guide capitalism isn’t invisible to the people in the transactional trenches. If the machinery behind the scenes is seized up for too long, inevitably, even the very of the supply chain (i.e. retail) will suffer.

Many capital rich companies, who only recently became comfortable with the cannabis space, are looking to deploy resources into the cannabis industry. The mechanisms to do so, and to create the jobs and economic development desired by the state and its taxpayers, are restricted to mergers, acquisitions and equity investment. Capital markets are not static. They are as dynamic as the cultures they serve and forcing them all to the sidelines for an extended period owing to the misdeeds of a small number of them, is painting with too broad a brush. It is perhaps due to the recent legality of the cannabis industry and its vestigial stigma that a transactional moratorium has been tolerated for as long as it has. It is difficult to imagine a comparable capital markets freeze in any other industry. 

In the ten years I have called Las Vegas home, I have watched our city and, indeed, our state, transform from side show to main event – as we are no longer content to ride shotgun to California’s success. We Nevadans have proven capable of, and even better equipped for, leading in multiple industries, including cannabis.

To that end, we are, or certainly should be, capable of completing an “extended review” of the license transfer process as well as developing a “more thorough and appropriate vetting process” in ninety days. Ostensibly, freezing all pending transfers was undertaken to ensure that those aspiring licensees were subject to such “more thorough” process. It is difficult to imagine, however, how this process could presently be incomplete. If anything, as the state is writing the rules as it goes, it makes sense to at least unlock the “pending” transfers and provide some guidance as to the expected timeline for future transfer approvals. 

We spent most of 2019 advising clients to avoid cannabis transactions in California, as the regulatory structure there is widely agreed to be in disarray. During most of that time, we were able to credibly suggest Nevada as an alternative market, free from such chaos, and capable of sustaining robust merger and acquisition activity without issue. However, as large and popular adult-use markets (e.g. Chicago, IL; Detroit, MI) open and expand, and agriculturally experienced markets expand into hemp and CBD production, we are left to advising clients that their dollars are better spent elsewhere. 

However, there is still time to start the new year and new decade with a local cannabis market that is looking to lead and provide prototypical regulatory and compliance guidance, as it was prior to last October. If we don’t, we can’t expect other cannabis-legal states or businesses choosing between them to wait for us to figure it out. And when federal legalization undoubtedly arrives, the loss of time in developing the Nevada market will no longer be treated trivially. 


Glenn H. Truitt, Esq. is the Managing Partner of Ideal Business Partners, a boutique multi-disciplinary professional firm focusing on serving businesses in the cannabis, hemp and CBD spaces. He is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and Stanford Law School, is licensed to practice in California and Nevada and has been practicing for 15 years.     

 

Member Blog: The Value Of Cannabis Patents To Cannabis Startups

by Dr. Dariush Adli, Adli Law Group

As of now, ten states have legalized recreational cannabis. Twenty-one other states allow medicinal use of cannabis, many of which are expected to legalize recreational cannabis in the near future. Investment in cannabis-related businesses totaled almost $10 billion in 2018 and is expected to top $16 billion this year.

Patent Protection

A patent, and the exclusivity it provides its owners can play a key role in assuring success for cannabis-focused businesses. However, protection and enforcement of cannabis-related patents faces unique challenges, since, despite its recent and spreading success at the state level, cannabis is still illegal at the federal level, while most intellectual property protection, as well as enforcement, is federal. Nevertheless, cannabis-focused businesses can benefit from patent protection.

Patents protect inventions, which meet the required criteria of utility, novelty, and non-obviousness. The four main categories of patents, including Utility Patents, Design Patents, Plant Patents, and Business Method Patents, are available to protect cannabis-related inventions. Despite illegality under federal law, the USPTO has been issuing patents for cannabis-related inventions for decades; a trend, which has significantly accelerated with the spread of legalization at the state level.

Recent examples of issued cannabis utility patents include USPN 10,028,987, issued on July 24, 2018, entitled “cannabis-infused milk,” and USPN 10,206,888, issued February 19, 2019, entitled “A cannabis-based therapeutic product for the treatment of chronic pain produced by separating hash resin from plant material of the cannabis plant.”

Plant patents protect new varieties of plants. USPN PP27,475, issued on December 20, 2016, is entitled “cannabis plant named ‘Ecuadorian Sativa’.” According to its specification, “The new strain has energizing and motivating psychoactive effects.”

Design patents protect ornamental, aesthetic and non-functional aspects of useful products. Design patents can protect cannabis-related products such as smoking paraphernalia and containers. For example, USPN D844,892, issued on April 2, 2019, issued for a “cannabis container,” and USPN D798,739, issued on October 3, 2017, is directed to a “cannabis storing container with individual tear-off lids.”

With issued cannabis patents multiplying, enforcement efforts have followed suit. Because patent enforcement disputes are predominantly within the jurisdiction of federal courts and cannabis remains illegal at the federal level, there have been questions as to whether a patent suit can be maintained in Federal court. The answer appears to be affirmative. Following several patent infringement cases, which were filed but then voluntarily dismissed prior to substantive court action, Cannabis Corporation sued Pure Hemp Collective, Inc. in federal court in Colorado. That case is still pending and recently survived a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Defendant Pure Hemp Collective Inc., where the court found that the asserted claims were subject matter eligible for patent protection.

The trend in the issuance of cannabis patents by the USPTO and enforcement by federal courts presents a unique opportunity to entrepreneurs, businesses, and investors to participate in the growing market on the “ground floor.”


Dr. Dariush Adli, Ph.D., Esq., is the Founder and President of ADLI Law Group. Recognized as a premier strategist in patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, and complex commercial disputes. Dr. Adli is widely sought after by businesses large and small, seeking effective strategies for protecting their valuable intellectual property assets. In that effort, Dr. Adli partners with businesses to identify their protectable intellectual property assets and to develop customized legal strategies, which are consistent with the businesses’ goals, resources, and risk tolerance.

ADLI Law Group is a multi-service law firm providing legal services in the areas of Intellectual Property (Patent, Trademark, Copyright and Trade Secret), Corporate and Commercial Transactions, Labor & Employment, Media and Entertainment, Real Estate, Construction, Products Liability, and Cannabis. Since its inception in 2010, ADLI Law’s mission and focus has been on providing quality client service and maximizing the value of its legal services to clients. We appreciate the trust and confidence our clients’ place in us, which has earned us a place on the highly coveted and competitive Los Angeles Business Journal’s list of the top 200 law firms in Los Angeles county.

 

This site uses cookies. By using this site or closing this notice, you agree to the use of cookies and our privacy policy.